Vance Press
Register Login

Rock Mechanics Letters

Open Access Research Article

Advanced Optimisation Of Ground Support Systems for Enhancing Underground Tunnel Stability in Geologically Adverse Conditions

by Richard Terence Masethe 1,* Richard Masethe 2  and  Tawanda Zvarivadza 1,.3
1
Department of Mining Engineering, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe
2
School of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal Durban, South Africa
3
Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resource Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 November 2024 / Accepted: 18 January 2025 / Published Online: 7 February 2025

Abstract

This research aims to optimize ground support systems for underground tunnels in geologically challenging environments, specifically addressing the reduction of Fall of Ground (FOG) incidents in a gold mine in Mashava, Zimbabwe. The study integrates advanced detection and classification methodologies to enhance tunnel stability and safety. Tunnel Reflection Tomography (TRT) was employed to identify unfavorable geological structures ahead of excavation, while core logging at 20 locations on level 7 provided rock mass quality assessments using three classification systems: Bieniawski’s Rock Mass Rating (RMR), Laubscher’s Mining Rock Mass Rating (MRMR), and Barton’s Q-system. The results consistently indicated poor rock mass quality, informing the design and refinement of a robust ground support system. Fallout height data from past FOG incidents and probabilistic key block analysis using J-Block software further validated the support system's effectiveness. The findings significantly reduce collapse risks and downtime, enhancing operational safety and efficiency. This research contributes to developing practical strategies and tools for improving tunnel stability in complex geological settings, offering valuable insights for future advancements in mining support technologies. The study's necessity stems from the industry's growing demand for innovative solutions to enhance tunnel stability in adverse geological settings, particularly in regions with limited access to advanced technologies or methodologies.


Copyright: © 2025 by Masethe, Masethe and Zvarivadza. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Show Figures

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Masethe, R. T.; Masethe, R.; Zvarivadza, T. Advanced Optimisation Of Ground Support Systems for Enhancing Underground Tunnel Stability in Geologically Adverse Conditions. Rock Mechanics Letters, 2025, 2, 9. https://doi.org/10.70425/rml.202501.9
AMA Style
Masethe R T, Masethe R, Zvarivadza T. Advanced Optimisation Of Ground Support Systems for Enhancing Underground Tunnel Stability in Geologically Adverse Conditions. Rock Mechanics Letters; 2025, 2(1):9. https://doi.org/10.70425/rml.202501.9
Chicago/Turabian Style
Masethe, Richard T.; Masethe, Richard; Zvarivadza, Tawanda 2025. "Advanced Optimisation Of Ground Support Systems for Enhancing Underground Tunnel Stability in Geologically Adverse Conditions" Rock Mechanics Letters 2, no.1:9. https://doi.org/10.70425/rml.202501.9
APA Style
Masethe, R. T., Masethe, R., & Zvarivadza, T. (2025). Advanced Optimisation Of Ground Support Systems for Enhancing Underground Tunnel Stability in Geologically Adverse Conditions. Rock Mechanics Letters, 2(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.70425/rml.202501.9

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Adoko AC, Phumaphi PT, Zvarivadza T. Quantifying rock mass behavior around underground excavation. American Rock Mechanics Association, Texas, USA; 2017.
  2. Arifuggaman AA. Study of underground tunnel stability and rock mass criterion. Research proposal. China University of Mining and Technology, China; 2022.
  3. Barton NR. Rock Mass Classification and Tunnel Reinforcement Selection. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, ISRM, Pau, France; 1989. p. 59-68.
  4. Barton N, Lien R, Lunde JJ. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech. 1974; 6:189-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01239496
  5. Bieniawski ZT. Engineering Rock Mass Classifications: A Complete Manual for Engineers and Geologists. Wiley, New York; 1989.
  6. Bieniawski ZT. Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. The Civil Engineer in South Africa. 1973;15:335-343.
  7. Bveke T. Work Related Learning Report. Midlands State University, Zimbabwe; 2017.
  8. Chen D. Design of rock bolting systems for underground excavations. PhD thesis. University of Wollongong; 1994.
  9. Chikande T. Reflection on support design in geotechnically challenging ground conditions: A case study Zimbabwe Great Dyke platinum mining. MSc Thesis. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 2020.
  10. Chunyang Z. The stability and roof-support optimisation of roadways passing through unfavorable geological bodies using advanced detection and monitoring methods, among others, in the Sanmenxia Bauxite Mine in China’s Henan Province; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-01439-1
  11. Daehnke A, Van Zyl M, Roberts MKC. Review and application of stope support design criteria. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 2001;101(3):135-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. hydromet.2008.02.007
  12. Deere DU, Deere DW. The Rock Quality Designation (RQD) Index in practice. Rock classification systems for engineering purposes. ASTM STP 984, Louis Kirkaldie, Ed., Philadelphia; 1988. p. 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP48465S
  13. Deere DU. Rock Quality Designation - A Simplified System. Proceedings of the 8th U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, American Rock Mechanics Asso-ciation; 1967. p. 17-24.
  14. Dyke GP. A quantitative correlation between the mining rock mass rating and in-situ rock mass rating classification systems. MSc Thesis. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 2006.
  15. Dong L, Xiangyun H. Review of Seismic Tomography Methods. J Seismol Res; 2006.
  16. Esterhuizen GS. JBlock User's Manual. Pretoria; 2003.
  17. Esterhuizen GS, Streuders SB. Rockfall hazard evaluation using probabilistic key block analysis. J South Afr Inst Min Metall; 1998. https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/1998/v98n3a5
  18. Jager AJ, Ryder JA. A Handbook on Rock Engineering Practice for Tubular Hard Rock Mining. Johannesburg: The Safety in Mines Research Advisory Com-mittee (SIMRAC); 1999.
  19. Jie L, Chunmu L. TRT Technology in Tunnel Geological Prediction Applica-tion. Railway Eng; 2011.
  20. Hoek E, Wood DF. Support in Hard Rock Underground Mines. Canada: Underground Support Systems; 1987.
  21. Hoek E. Estimating the Safety Factor for Rock Slopes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr. 1995;32(6):555-566.
  22. Hoek E, Brown ET. Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 1997;34(8):1165-1186. https://doi.org/10.106/S1365-1609(97)80069-X
  23. Hoek E, Brown ET. Underground Excavations in Rock. 1st ed. London: CRC Press; 1980. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482288926
  24. Laubscher DH. A Geomechanics Classification System for the Rating of Rock Mass in Mine Design. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 1990;90(10):257-273.
  25. Martin CD, Kaiser PK, McCreath DR. Hoek-Brown parameters for predicting the depth of brittle failure around tunnels. Can Geotech J. 1999;36(1):136-151. https://doi.org/10.1139/t98-072
  26. Mapuranga R. Blanket Mine Production increased by 19%. Mining Zimbabwe Magazine. 2024;74(10). Available from: https://miningzimbabwe.com/issue74.
  27. Munemo P. Prediction of Ground Instability for Coinciding Mining Operations. MSc Thesis. University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 2021.
  28. Netshilaphala VC. Fall of ground management in shallow underground hard mining: a case study in a chrome mine. MSc Thesis. University of Witwa-tersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; 2018.
  29. Nkosi GB. Validation of the current support design methodology at mine A using key block analysis. MSc Thesis. University of Witwatersrand, Johan-nesburg, South Africa; 2020.
  30. Franklin D, Vorster B. Immediate ground support after development or stope exposure can prevent falls of ground. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 2008; South Africa.
  31. Stacey TR, Gumede H. Measurement of typical joint characteristics in South African gold mines and the use of these characteristics in the prediction of rockfalls. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 2007; 107(5): 335-343.
  32. Stacey TR, Swart AH. Rock Engineering Practice for Shallow and Opencast Mines. Johannesburg: Safety in Mines Research Advisory Committee Publi-cations; 2001.
  33. Palmstrom A. RQD - A Proposed Method for Classification of Rock Masses Based on Drillcore Data. Geol Soc Swed, Series C. 1974;578:1-33.
  34. Potvin Y, Hadjigeorgiou J. Ground support for underground mines. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, The University of Western Australia, Australia; 2020.
  35. Wang Y, Lu W. Tunnel Reflection Tomography for Rock Mass Imaging. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technol. 2011;26(6):775-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2011.04.007
  36. Wang Y, Alumbaugh D, Chang J. Tunnel Reflection Tomography for Imaging Rock Mass Structure. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. 2000;38(4):1851-1861. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.868882
  37. Windsor CR. Rockfall Hazard Assessment and Mitigation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 1999;36(6):839-848.
  38. Windsor CR, Thompson AG. Rockfall and Rock Fall Hazards, an Engineering Approach. Proceedings of the 33rd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Santa Fe, New Mexico; 1992. p. 751-760.